We have always seen the 1971 Liberation War in a fragmented way. While we saw it as a fight for the autonomy and protection of the nationhood of the people of Bengal, the Pakistani pigs saw it as ethnic cleansing. They thought that by killing a few Hindus and Rabindranath Tagore devotees, the rest of the Hindus would flee to India and they would be able to open the fundamentalist pig pen of the Mullah Military Alliance in East Pakistan as well.
But just as the pigs have no idea about human culture, neither did the Pakistanis. They did not understand that even if all the ethnicities of West Pakistan were put together, there was a much larger and more diverse Bengali culture and nationhood. Those military pigs had no idea that a religious alliance of small ethnicities could not eliminate a fundamental organic nationhood much larger than theirs. Why 3 million, even if they gave their lives for 30 million people, they could not defeat the Bengali nation.
The next generation of those pigs are obsessed with the same dream planned by the CIA ISI with the money of the US Deep State, which will not succeed even if they kill 90 million now. The present idiots, impotents and hypocrites carrying the flag of false Islam do not know that they have started a fight against the existence of a large ancient people, the consequences of which will be terrible for them.
Small nations or occupiers can be eliminated by ethnic cleansing, but large and local ones cannot. Yet they carried out the genocide of 71 to do that. From Benjamin Valentino's book 'Final Solution: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth Century':
"From Ethnic Cleansing to Genocide:
As noted at the beginning of this chapter, ethnic cleansing and mass killing are often confused, but they are not the same thing. Ethnic cleansing almost always involves significant violence and coercion, but it is carried out in addition to genocide.
A comparison of the three genocidal regimes discussed in this chapter and some other less violent cases of ethnic cleansing shows that three factors can influence whether ethnic cleansing will turn into genocide:
(1) the size of the population targeted,
(2) how quickly the ethnic cleansing is carried out, and
(3) the availability of a suitable territory or territory to receive asylum seekers. Whether there is territory.
These variables can operate individually or in combination. While many other factors may play a role, these three are particularly important because each of them directly affects the extent to which a ruler can relocate victims without resorting to violent means.
The most obvious factor that can affect the likelihood that leaders will commit genocide for the purpose of ethnic cleansing is the size of the population targeted for removal. All else being equal, the larger the population, the more likely it is that it will be subjected to violence.
In 1915, there were about 200,000 Armenians in Turkey; in 1941, there were about 10 million Jews in German-occupied Europe and the Soviet Union; and in 1994, there were between 650,000 and 930,000 Tutsis in Rwanda.
Some of the most violent ethnic genocides of this century also involved the ethnic cleansing of large populations.
From 1945 to 1947 During the expulsion of about 12 million ethnic Germans from Eastern Europe in 1947–48, about 10 million people were forcibly displaced and 500,000 to 100,000 people lost their lives. During the partition of Bangladesh in 1971, more than 10 million Bengalis were uprooted from their homes and 500,000 to 300,000 of them (mostly Hindus) were killed.
No comments:
Post a Comment