love' between men and women is basically art

 

The responsibility for a woman's orgasm lies with the man. Where a man is happy and sleeps peacefully when he ejaculates. There, a woman's orgasm-free, unhappy sex life, insomnia, which leads to complaints and disrespect towards her male partner, gives rise to hatred. But is this a man's inability? What is his responsibility for a woman's orgasm?

If there are seven billion people in the world, then almost all of them are probably the product of orgasm-free intercourse. What else can we call this except a strange whim of nature? Female orgasm is secondary to the preservation of nature's lineage! But what we call the love of a woman and a man is based on the female orgasm. When she gets it, she thinks she is happy. She loves and respects her partner. However, it only works if the man holds the board and hammers the nail. In the past centuries, our ancestors have achieved the impossible by marrying two opposite species and forming a social bond. Basically, these two opposite sexes have been ruled by one another through strict patriarchy. Although scientists are still amazed to think how patriarchal societies were formed in all corners of the world at the same time.

Anyway, what I want to say is that 'love' between men and women is basically art. In poetry and novels, it is the narrative of a specific frame or the emotion of the time that was true for that time. If you write the story of your entire life, it will not be love and love. Devdas fell asleep right after intercourse, turning around and hugging, and Parvati remained sleepless due to lack of orgasm - with this comes a thousand crises of life, there is the boredom of getting old... This is why Sarat Chandra killed Devdas and saved their love. Just as we imagine, if Rose and Jack from Titanic had survived together, how much would their quarrels and disputes have been later on. That is why Lavanya in the last poem did not marry Amit. Would Devdas have had a happy life if he had married Parvati? It would have been or not....

Many people confuse feminism with these. Misogyny is not a part of feminism. We need to know the will of nature and our instincts as humans first. Nature did not make any laws for women where she would be half of men. We made these. The purpose of feminism is to give women's freedom as humans, equal rights to men, and even to free them from the burden that patriarchy has given men to bear alone. In the future world, there may be no marriage, I do not know how much men and women will give importance to 'love and affection' in sex and will want to bring their orgasms into a contract like marriage. In America, a survey has shown that husbands and wives are not having physical intercourse there and they are getting used to masturbation! None of this is part of feminism. It is like taking one's own sexual satisfaction into one's own hands. Humans are probably going through a difficult time in civilization now.

Susupto Pathok