Women who behave toxically on Facebook are basically seeking male attention and trying to suppress other women. They try to prove, I am smarter, more moral, more desirable." This is part of the ancient sexual display, where "moral superiority" has become modern beauty. The woman who could isolate a rival woman from the tribe through words, rumors, or defamation, got the attention, food, and reproduction of men. In other words, toxicity was a survival strategy.
In prehistoric times, men were physically stronger, so women chose psychological weapons, they threw reproaches and insults at men instead of spears. Women's weapons were rumors, harassment, insults, and reproaches. A woman defamed another woman so that she became unfaithful to men, whores, polygamous, and stigmatized, she competed with her at the genetic level, as if to wipe the genes of the competing woman from the world. The "reputation war" of the Stone Age still remains in women's DNA.
In primitive societies, toxicity was not just an attack, but a bonding mechanism. Two or three women together If they criticized someone else, they would form a strong alliance — which would increase food sharing, childcare, or male protection in the tribe. So toxicity was a process of creating social unity. Today's "group chat gossip" or "comment alliance" is the digital version of that ancient instinct.
It was necessary to maintain social hierarchy in the tribe; toxicity maintained that hierarchy. Women who could dominate others would increase their social status and reproductive success. So toxicity also worked as a kind of "social status algorithm".
However, intelligent women could be the most effective toxic. Women who could skillfully humiliate others and present themselves as victims or moralists would receive sympathy and social support from the tribe. This would improve their social intelligence, theory of mind, and language skills — which played a huge role in the evolution of the human brain. That is, toxicity indirectly contributed to the development of the human brain.
And this is called "Intersexual Competition"! Female-centered in human society The main reason why scams are so powerful is that women have been using scams or stigma as a weapon since prehistoric times.
When a woman makes a sarcastic or derogatory comment about someone—likes, reactions, or supportive comments—she gets a momentary dopamine surge in her brain. This triggers the ancient status reward circuit in her brain, which was once important for controlling social status in tribes.
In today’s digital ecosystem, attention = sexual currency. Women who regularly argue, post toxic, or engage in conflict—unwittingly send an “availability signal” to men’s brains. This gets them more short-term mating, but loses long-term trust value. Evolutionarily, this is a misfire adaptation — what was once useful for their survival is now self-defeating.
Our brains are built with Stone Age circuitry,
but we live in the server age. So the old social competition programs are now distorted and It is taking a destructive turn—where “status war” has become “comment war.”
Lihan Prime
No comments:
Post a Comment