Arresting Baul Boyatis by tying the national flag to their heads and breaking the sculptures of the Liberation War is Shibir's signature politics. Jamaat Shibir's affiliate organizations are very powerful. For example, the coaching centers of Buet Medical University are Shibir's sister concerns, but no one's father can afford to run them. Such people who have never prayed in their lives, eat interest, mingle with Westerners, live an unlawful life, have married infidels, run NGOs, are agents of Shibir, whose father can afford to run them? Anyone who is anti-Awami League does not think twice about sleeping with Shibir to stop the Awami League. This is where the fun lies. Shibir plays to destroy those who still have a business to do with the Liberation War, and the rest are just spectators. For example, March 26 is Independence Day, but by presenting Zia as the proclaimer of independence on March 27, the BNP's narrative of Zia as the proclaimer of independence has been shattered, even Khaleda Zia herself could not grasp it sitting in front of her!
Jamaat Shibir is feeling a demonic excitement by tying the national flag to its forehead to bury the Liberation War of Bangladesh. The act of nationally replacing Lalon with Rabindranath is killing two birds with one stone, keeping Rabindranath away, while suppressing Lalon on the field by mob. The national remembrance of Lalon was praised, no one could call them fundamentalists, on the other hand, the real work was completed by filing cases against Lalon fans, excluding them from singing and dancing schools, and instilling fear in the minds of the youth through cases.
Why do you think that girls who have never worn a headscarf in their lives, who take classes in TV seminars and universities with a tip on their foreheads, are knowingly playing these games of the Shibir? It's very simple. Have you heard of the world's feminist icon Simone de Beauvoir? She can be called the 'mother of the nation' in the style of feminism! The lady was one of the supporters of Khomeini's rise to power in Iran. They knew that Khomeini was an Islamic fundamentalist. They had great support under the protection of France Khomeini. After Khomeini took power, when Iranian women's education, clothing, politics, and business were restricted, Simone Ma'am was completely silent! She didn't say a single word. Because Simone Ma'am and her husband Jean-Paul Sartre were both Marxists. They believed that the fall of the US-backed Reza Shah of Iran was the only desirable thing. Their only desirable thing was the defeat of the imperialist Americans from Iran. What they didn't say verbally, another Marxist philosopher, Michel Foucault, openly said, "We don't care whether the mullahs came to power or not, the collapse of US imperialism there is a big deal for us..." I couldn't quote Foucault's statement exactly, but that was the gist of it.
Is Deepti Chowdhury, who shouted 'My father was a freedom fighter' on Channel I, doing Jamaat Shibir politics? Oh no. She is anti-Awami League. Historically, India's friend, the Awami League, is a friendly party. This is the right politics for the existence of Bangladesh. But here, those who believe in anti-India (in other words, anti-Hindu for the sake of Muslim nationalism) politics, don't care if the Awami League is ruled by a mullah. The problem is that if Simone de Beauvoir supports Khomeini, it will be a direct problem for Iran, not France. But because of the Simones here, an anti-women government will come to Bangladesh. Have you seen the pictures of the Simones of Iran celebrating Khomeini's revolution by honking their horns on the streets in open-topped cars? The modern girls who studied at those universities then disappeared after a year. I saw that in July last year. Even if a journalist is verbally attacked by a host out of professionalism, he remains steadfast in his professionalism, does not get emotional about anything. But Deepti Chowdhury did the scandal on the TV set that day to incite a mob against Justice Manik, to arouse intense anger against him. The children of that freedom fighter family now host a talk show every day by installing a secret Jamaat. If the Jamaat can completely run the state like them, will Bangladesh be tolerable for a 'barbaric journalist' like Deepti? It will not be. They also know. But to wink at one eye of the Awami League, they are ready to wink at both of their own eyes!
They said that the Boyatis were arrested, that the women's quota was abolished, that women were urged to stay at home, that Ahmadis were banned, why did the rest of them keep quiet even when all these things happened? I was talking about Michel Foucault. Speaking of Simon Ma'am, they think, like them, that the collapse of a diplomatic government friendly to India is a big deal to them. They don't care whether women die when they enter their homes, or whether Bauls and other people with different ideologies flee if they stay in this country.
©Sushupta Pathak
No comments:
Post a Comment